Media 2 - Mr Halsey

Opening gets a brilliant reaction from the class - this immediately shows the use of contrapuntal sound has been effective Slightly different interpretation of the brief - instead of one piece of music and different images, you've got one video clip and different audio. It still works but a good reminder to pay close attention to the brief WWW: Contrapuntal music was very well done The 2 edited elements of sound were edited in correctly music fit well funny very effective sound wise EBI: used a montage of pictures for half of it use a different video clip the transition between the audio had some form of parallel sound may use romantic parallel

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vypP5g7Tn0U Opening gets a brilliant reaction from the class - this immediately shows the use of contrapuntal sound has been effective Slightly different interpretation of the brief - instead of one piece of music and different images, you've got one video clip and different audio. It still works but a good reminder to pay close attention to the brief WWW: Contrapuntal music was very well done The 2 edited elements of sound were edited in correctly music fit well funny very effective sound wise EBI: used a montage of pictures for half of it use a different video clip the transition between the audio had some form of parallel sound may use romantic parallel

The bubbles - as discussed, very strange? Need to work out how to undo options in iMovie Music is good for a time lapse movie but im not sure if it fits this time lapse movie (horror genre) Framing of the shot is the big weakness - top third is wasted in terms of the shot and cant see the subject very clearly. In terms of the make-up/ mise-en-scene itself... very much Eleven from stranger things or ET in terms of wig and make-up. Was this the intention? WWW: Good make-up Pace/ Good timing Good music choice Good angle Good improvisation  Well edited EBI: Remove Bubbles The music did not fit the frame add an after picture Framing

https://youtu.be/cLyg3WvFl_E

There is a strong contrast between light and dark as this is evident in that actors face between portrayed in the dark (with a bit of light) and the prop, being the smoke, is lit up. There is a presence of a key light as the left side of the actors face is very bright and is counteracted with the filler light which created an affect on the actor. You could also argue that there is evidence of High-key lighting as the actor appears more realistic and that the shadows have been softened by a filler light. But on the other hand, there is minor contrast between light and dark as there is a clear different of brightness on the actors face. There is minor use of top lighting as some bits of the actors hair has been lit up, which depicts it. There is no under lighting and this may be because it is a completely different genre as under lighting is mainly used for horror movies. There is also back lighting but is not presented as much to perform a silhouette. 2) You could argue that there...